Meaningful Tax Reform: Is a "Main Street"-Focused Alternative the Best Path Forward?

An independent research organization promoting new ideas for the advancement of global security, prosperity and freedom.Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law.Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, and policy briefings and recommendations.Hudson Institute is a 501(c)(3) organization financed by tax deductible contributions from private individuals, corporations, foundations, and by government grants.

Hudson Institute

While all sides agree that the U.S. tax code needs an overhaul, there are significant disagreements about the primary goals of tax reform and the best means to achieve them. Jeffrey H. Anderson’s <A STYLE="text-decoration: none;" HREF="https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.hudson.org/files/publications/20160226AndersonMainStreetTaxPlan.pdf" TARGET="_blank" DATA-MSYS-CLICKTRACK="0" REL="nofollow noopener noreferrer">Main Street Tax Plan</A> attempts to advance the tax reform debate by laying out a proposal, based on clear objectives, that can benefit everyday Americans.
<A STYLE="text-decoration: none;" HREF="https://s3.amazonaws.com/media.hudson.org/files/publications/20160226AndersonMainStreetTaxPlan.pdf" TARGET="_blank" DATA-MSYS-CLICKTRACK="0" REL="nofollow noopener noreferrer">The Main Street Tax Plan</A> aims to spur economic growth, improve the lives of American workers, and increase fiscal responsibility. The Tax Foundation found that the plan would expand the size of the U.S. economy by $2 trillion within a decade (in the ballpark of growth generated by the Reagan and Kennedy tax cuts); benefit the average American twice as much as the top one percent; and raise revenues by $679 billion while cutting taxes (as taxes on increased growth would exceed lost revenue from the tax cuts themselves). In addition, the plan would simplify the tax code, end the marriage penalty, and make it easier to reform Medicare.
On March 30, Hudson Institute will host a discussion on tax reform featuring the Tax Foundation’s Kyle Pomerleau, AEI’s Alan Viard, the Tax Policy Center’s Eric Toder, the Ethics and Public Policy Center’s Henry Olsen, and the plan’s author, Hudson’s Jeffrey Anderson. They will assess the merits and limitations of Anderson’s proposal and its prospects for providing a way forward to meaningful tax reform.
 
 
This event will be live streamed on <A TITLE="Hudson Institute" HREF="http://www.hudson.org" DATA-MSYS-CLICKTRACK="0" REL="nofollow noopener noreferrer">Hudson's homepage.</A>

Online event registration has ended. To register at the door, please bring a business card.

Our {communityGuidelinesLink} describe the sort of content we prohibit on Eventbrite. If you suspect an event may be in violation, you can report it to us so we can investigate.

To report other categories of prohibited or illegal content, submit {link}

Ticket sales have ended

Meaningful Tax Reform: Is a "Main Street"-Focused Alternative the Best Path Forward?

More events from Hudson Institute

Discover more events from Hudson Institute, from Government to other experiences you might love.

Ticket sales have ended

Meaningful Tax Reform: Is a "Main Street"-Focused Alternative the Best Path Forward?

More events from Hudson Institute

Discover more events from Hudson Institute, from Government to other experiences you might love.

You might also like...

Browse more events with different dates, prices, and formats to find your next great experience.